Salt Lake Bees
SL · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 32 | 28 | +3 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.3 | 26.9 | +1.4 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1734 | 1629 | +104 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 33.9% | 35.2% | −1.3% | 15th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 176 | 81 | +94 | 8th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 42 | 39 | +2 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 81.3% | 72.4% | +8.9% | 4th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 22 | 20 | +1 | 18th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -109 | 0 | −109 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.95 | 0.00 | −0.95 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.07 | 5.44 | +0.63 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.02 | 5.44 | +1.58 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .443 | .500 | −.057 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .434 | .501 | −.067 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.1 | -0.1 | +1.2 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .571 | .503 | +.068 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .333 | .499 | −.166 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .455 | .504 | −.049 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .492 | .518 | −.026 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .385 | .482 | −.097 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .483 | .501 | −.018 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 18th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".