Hudson Valley Renegades
HV · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 25 | 26 | −1 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.2 | 22.7 | +0.5 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4262 | 4235 | +26 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 97.7% | 94.5% | +3.2% | 10th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 33 | 34 | −1 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 63.4% | 63.7% | −0.3% | 20th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 21 | 18 | +2 | 25th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 42 | 0 | +42 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.37 | 0.00 | +0.37 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.42 | 5.55 | −0.13 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.05 | 5.54 | −0.49 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .496 | .500 | −.004 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .532 | .501 | +.031 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.1 | -0.1 | −4.0 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .467 | .497 | −.030 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .579 | .500 | +.079 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .545 | .510 | +.035 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .467 | .522 | −.055 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .528 | .479 | +.049 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .474 | .510 | −.036 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 24th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".