Asheville Tourists
ASH · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 32 | 27 | +4 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.3 | 22.7 | +0.6 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4441 | 4633 | −192 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 89.1% | 94.7% | −5.7% | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 36 | 36 | — | 15th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 54.4% | 64.4% | −10.0% | 28th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 25 | 20 | +4 | 27th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -229 | 0 | −229 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.86 | 0.00 | −1.86 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.13 | 5.55 | +0.58 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.99 | 5.55 | +2.44 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .333 | .500 | −.167 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .381 | .501 | −.120 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -5.9 | -0.1 | −5.8 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .412 | .498 | −.086 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .261 | .502 | −.240 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .308 | .513 | −.205 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .373 | .521 | −.148 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .297 | .481 | −.184 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .333 | .509 | −.176 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 6 | +1 | 4th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".