Toronto Blue Jays logo

Toronto Blue Jays

TOR · AL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 527 686 −159 11th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 12.2% 15.4% −3.2% 12th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.9 -2.3 +0.4 10th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 6 5 — 17th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 801 789 +11 20th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 18.6% 17.8% +0.8% 20th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 2.1 3.6 −1.5 30th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 5.4 8.2 −2.8 30th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 7.9 11.4 −3.5 29th of 30
Total position-player WAR 10.5 13.3 −2.8 25th of 30
Total pitching WAR 13.4 9.9 +3.5 7th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 51.4% 65.2% −13.8% 26th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.36 0.41 −0.05 22nd of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 1 2 −1 25th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 0 0 — 11th of 30
Hitters used 21 21 — 17th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.4 28.4 +0.9 9th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 267 1018 −751 30th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 6.2% 22.8% −16.6% 30th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 364 284 +79 10th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 28 26 +1 9th of 30
Rotation WAR 9.6 8.8 +0.8 13th of 30
Bullpen WAR 5.5 3.3 +2.2 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 8.3 6.5 +1.8 4th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 73.5% 70.3% +3.1% 10th of 30
Quality starts 35 38 −3 22nd of 30
Blown saves 11 17 −6 2nd of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -61 0 −61 25th of 30
Run differential per game -0.54 0.00 −0.54 25th of 30
Runs scored per game 3.89 4.49 −0.60 30th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.43 4.49 −0.06 15th of 30
Winning percentage .465 .500 −.035 24th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .441 .501 −.060 26th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 2.7 -0.2 +2.8 8th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .433 .500 −.067 25th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .414 .498 −.084 24th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .500 .516 −.016 15th of 30
Home winning percentage .475 .523 −.048 22nd of 30
Road winning percentage .455 .477 −.022 19th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .455 .500 −.046 21st of 30
Longest winning streak 4 6 −2 24th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 114 113 — 4th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4215 4299 −84 29th of 30
Team At Bats 3818 3819 −1 15th of 30
Team Runs 444 510 −66 30th of 30
Team Hits 924 931 −7 17th of 30
Team Doubles 177 177 — 13th of 30
Team Triples 7 15 −8 30th of 30
Team Home Runs 108 131 −23 29th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 425 488 −63 30th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 51 77 −26 27th of 30
Team Walks 306 382 −76 29th of 30
Team Strikeouts 818 951 −133 2nd of 30
Team Walk Rate 7.3% 8.9% −1.6% 29th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 19.4% 22.1% −2.7% 3rd of 30
Team Batting Average .242 .244 −.002 18th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .303 .318 −.015 29th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .377 .402 −.024 28th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .680 .720 −.040 29th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 53 56 −3 24th of 30
Team Losses 61 56 +4 24th of 30
Team Saves 35 29 +5 3rd of 30
Team Games 114 113 — 4th of 30
Team Games Started 114 113 — 4th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1007.2 1007.1 — 11th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 19th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1004 951 +52 10th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 9.0 8.5 +0.5 8th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.6 3.4 +0.2 21st of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.07 4.18 −0.11 12th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".