Add SportsStats to your home screen

Texas Rangers

TEX · AL West · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1217 821 +395 25th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 21.2% 14.6% +6.6% 24th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -4.0 -2.6 −1.4 26th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 10 5 +4 29th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 592 1023 −431 6th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 9.9% 17.3% −7.4% 6th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.0 4.2 +0.8 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 9.9 10.0 −0.1 15th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 13.9 13.9 — 14th of 30
Total position-player WAR 16.6 17.1 −0.5 15th of 30
Total pitching WAR 14.8 13.3 +1.5 12th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 59.6% 61.4% −1.8% 15th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.44 0.44 — 15th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 4 3 — 9th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 4th of 30
Hitters used 24 23 — 10th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.5 28.4 +1.2 6th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1168 1323 −155 15th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 20.4% 23.5% −3.1% 15th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 563 352 +210 7th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 34 31 +2 7th of 30
Rotation WAR 16.2 11.6 +4.6 5th of 30
Bullpen WAR 6.0 4.7 +1.3 9th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 8.8 8.0 +0.8 11th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 78.9% 71.0% +7.9% 3rd of 30
Quality starts 47 50 −3 17th of 30
Blown saves 21 22 −1 10th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -46 0 −46 22nd of 30
Run differential per game -0.32 0.00 −0.32 22nd of 30
Runs scored per game 4.10 4.48 −0.38 26th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.43 4.48 −0.05 14th of 30
Winning percentage .490 .500 −.010 17th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .466 .501 −.035 22nd of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 3.4 -0.2 +3.6 7th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .611 .499 +.112 3rd of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .452 .499 −.047 19th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .667 .507 +.160 3rd of 30
Home winning percentage .549 .525 +.024 11th of 30
Road winning percentage .431 .476 −.044 22nd of 30
Winning percentage within the division .449 .502 −.053 24th of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 — 12th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 143 142 — 2nd of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5339 5398 −59 23rd of 30
Team At Bats 4747 4794 −47 24th of 30
Team Runs 587 638 −51 26th of 30
Team Hits 1151 1169 −18 20th of 30
Team Doubles 209 221 −12 21st of 30
Team Triples 22 19 +2 9th of 30
Team Home Runs 162 163 −1 17th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 567 610 −43 25th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 66 96 −30 27th of 30
Team Walks 465 481 −16 18th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1207 1192 +15 19th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.7% 8.9% −0.2% 16th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 22.6% 22.1% +0.5% 20th of 30
Team Batting Average .242 .244 −.002 17th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .317 .318 −.002 13th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .398 .400 −.002 18th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .715 .719 −.004 18th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 70 71 −1 17th of 30
Team Losses 73 71 +1 17th of 30
Team Saves 39 36 +2 11th of 30
Team Games 143 142 — 2nd of 30
Team Games Started 143 142 — 2nd of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1253.1 1264.2 −11.1 29th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 22nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1206 1192 +14 13th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.7 8.5 +0.2 11th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.1 3.4 −0.3 7th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.29 4.17 +0.12 21st of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".