Add SportsStats to your home screen

MLB · AL East

Tampa Bay Rays

TB · 2026

See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 273 961 −688 2nd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 4.0% 15.0% −11.0% 2nd of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -0.8 -2.9 +2.1 2nd of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 2 6 −4 1st of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 709 1111 −402 11th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 10.3% 16.5% −6.2% 10th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.3 4.9 +0.4 11th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 11.3 11.4 −0.1 12th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 16.4 15.8 +0.6 11th of 30
Total position-player WAR 26.2 19.4 +6.8 3rd of 30
Total pitching WAR 18.9 15.1 +3.8 8th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 43.1% 62.3% −19.1% 30th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.42 0.45 −0.03 20th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 7 4 +2 1st of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 1 — 11th of 30
Hitters used 21 24 −3 24th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.5 28.3 +0.2 14th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1004 1557 −553 22nd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 14.9% 24.4% −9.5% 23rd of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 686 397 +288 6th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 32 32 — 15th of 30
Rotation WAR 15.7 13.1 +2.6 8th of 30
Bullpen WAR 6.7 6.5 +0.2 15th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 10.3 8.8 +1.5 8th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 72.6% 71.5% +1.0% 15th of 30
Quality starts 58 56 +1 13th of 30
Blown saves 19 26 −7 5th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 86 0 +86 6th of 30
Run differential per game 0.53 0.00 +0.53 6th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.54 4.48 +0.06 12th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.01 4.48 −0.47 6th of 30
Winning percentage .605 .500 +.105 3rd of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .557 .502 +.055 6th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 7.8 -0.3 +8.1 2nd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .641 .499 +.142 1st of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .500 .500 — 13th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .571 .510 +.061 9th of 30
Home winning percentage .679 .529 +.150 1st of 30
Road winning percentage .531 .471 +.060 7th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .538 .500 +.038 9th of 30
Longest winning streak 9 6 +2 3rd of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6106 6128 −22 18th of 30
Team At Bats 5444 5444 — 17th of 30
Team Runs 736 725 +10 12th of 30
Team Hits 1405 1328 +76 2nd of 30
Team Doubles 230 249 −19 25th of 30
Team Triples 22 22 — 13th of 30
Team Home Runs 169 185 −16 22nd of 30
Team Runs Batted In 700 693 +6 13th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 164 109 +54 2nd of 30
Team Walks 514 544 −30 22nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1145 1356 −211 1st of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.4% 8.9% −0.5% 22nd of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 18.8% 22.1% −3.3% 1st of 30
Team Batting Average .258 .244 +.014 1st of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .326 .318 +.008 5th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .402 .400 +.002 12th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .728 .719 +.009 8th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 98 80 +17 3rd of 30
Team Losses 64 80 −16 3rd of 30
Team Saves 58 41 +16 1st of 30
Team Blown Saves 19 23 −4 5th of 30
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1443.0 1435.2 +7.0 4th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1322 1356 −34 19th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.2 8.5 −0.3 19th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 2.6 3.4 −0.8 1st of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.70 4.17 −0.47 7th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".