Add SportsStats to your home screen

Tampa Bay Rays

TB · AL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 52 774 −722 1st of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 0.9% 13.9% −13.1% 1st of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -0.6 -2.6 +2.0 1st of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 1 5 −4 1st of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 933 1017 −84 19th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 15.7% 17.4% −1.8% 17th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.4 4.2 +0.2 8th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 9.8 9.9 −0.1 14th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 14.3 13.7 +0.6 11th of 30
Total position-player WAR 22.3 16.8 +5.5 4th of 30
Total pitching WAR 16.5 13.1 +3.4 9th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 43.9% 61.6% −17.7% 28th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.38 0.43 −0.06 22nd of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 3 +1 4th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 4th of 30
Hitters used 20 23 −3 26th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.5 28.4 +0.2 15th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 838 1301 −463 22nd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 14.3% 23.4% −9.1% 22nd of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 600 347 +252 6th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 29 30 −1 22nd of 30
Rotation WAR 14.0 11.5 +2.5 8th of 30
Bullpen WAR 6.1 4.6 +1.5 7th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 9.0 7.9 +1.1 9th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 73.5% 71.0% +2.5% 12th of 30
Quality starts 50 49 — 15th of 30
Blown saves 15 22 −7 4th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 45 0 +45 8th of 30
Run differential per game 0.32 0.00 +0.32 8th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.49 4.48 +0.01 14th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.16 4.48 −0.32 8th of 30
Winning percentage .593 .500 +.093 2nd of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .534 .501 +.033 8th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 8.2 -0.2 +8.4 1st of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .588 .499 +.089 4th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .439 .499 −.060 22nd of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .538 .510 +.028 12th of 30
Home winning percentage .653 .527 +.126 2nd of 30
Road winning percentage .529 .474 +.055 8th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .556 .503 +.053 9th of 30
Longest winning streak 9 6 +2 3rd of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 140 140 — 17th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5282 5320 −38 18th of 30
Team At Bats 4701 4725 −24 20th of 30
Team Runs 628 629 −1 16th of 30
Team Hits 1220 1152 +67 3rd of 30
Team Doubles 194 218 −24 28th of 30
Team Triples 21 18 +2 11th of 30
Team Home Runs 144 160 −16 24th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 596 601 −5 17th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 137 95 +41 4th of 30
Team Walks 448 474 −26 22nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 976 1174 −198 1st of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.5% 8.9% −0.4% 20th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 18.5% 22.1% −3.6% 1st of 30
Team Batting Average .260 .244 +.016 1st of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .328 .318 +.010 5th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .402 .400 +.002 15th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .730 .719 +.011 8th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 83 70 +12 2nd of 30
Team Losses 57 70 −13 2nd of 30
Team Saves 54 36 +17 1st of 30
Team Games 140 140 — 17th of 30
Team Games Started 140 140 — 17th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1250.0 1246.1 +3.1 12th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1144 1174 −30 18th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.2 8.5 −0.3 19th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 2.5 3.4 −0.9 1st of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.79 4.17 −0.38 8th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".