Add SportsStats to your home screen

Pittsburgh Pirates

PIT · NL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 863 862 — 17th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 14.8% 14.6% +0.2% 16th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.6 -2.8 +0.2 14th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 7 5 +1 17th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 939 1068 −129 17th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 14.1% 17.2% −3.1% 13th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.1 4.4 −0.3 17th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 9.6 10.4 −0.8 19th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 13.0 14.5 −1.5 20th of 30
Total position-player WAR 16.3 17.8 −1.5 19th of 30
Total pitching WAR 20.6 13.9 +6.7 5th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 58.9% 61.5% −2.6% 16th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.38 0.44 −0.06 27th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 4 4 — 12th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 6th of 30
Hitters used 23 23 — 19th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.5 28.3 +0.1 15th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 957 1411 −454 19th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 16.4% 23.9% −7.5% 19th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 280 369 −89 16th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 30 31 −1 18th of 30
Rotation WAR 18.4 12.1 +6.3 3rd of 30
Bullpen WAR 10.1 5.2 +4.9 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 9.8 8.3 +1.5 8th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 69.5% 71.2% −1.7% 19th of 30
Quality starts 45 52 −7 23rd of 30
Blown saves 33 24 +8 28th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 26 0 +26 11th of 30
Run differential per game 0.17 0.00 +0.17 11th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.79 4.49 +0.30 5th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.61 4.49 +0.12 21st of 30
Winning percentage .500 .500 — 13th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .517 .502 +.015 11th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -2.5 -0.2 −2.3 23rd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .581 .499 +.082 5th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .551 .499 +.052 9th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .375 .508 −.133 24th of 30
Home winning percentage .528 .530 −.002 14th of 30
Road winning percentage .474 .470 +.004 15th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .500 .502 −.002 15th of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 18th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 150 149 — 2nd of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5813 5665 +147 3rd of 30
Team At Bats 5154 5031 +122 1st of 30
Team Runs 718 672 +45 5th of 30
Team Hits 1302 1228 +73 3rd of 30
Team Doubles 224 232 −8 19th of 30
Team Triples 15 20 −5 22nd of 30
Team Home Runs 170 172 −2 17th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 685 643 +41 5th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 126 100 +25 8th of 30
Team Walks 533 504 +28 6th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1395 1250 +144 27th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.2% 8.9% +0.3% 11th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 24.0% 22.1% +1.9% 25th of 30
Team Batting Average .253 .244 +.009 4th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .330 .319 +.011 4th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .401 .401 — 15th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .731 .719 +.012 7th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 75 74 — 13th of 30
Team Losses 75 74 — 13th of 30
Team Saves 34 38 −4 22nd of 30
Team Games 150 149 — 2nd of 30
Team Games Started 150 149 — 2nd of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1338.1 1327.0 +11.0 3rd of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1369 1250 +118 5th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 9.2 8.5 +0.7 5th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.7 3.4 +0.3 22nd of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.18 4.19 −0.01 15th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".