Add SportsStats to your home screen

Philadelphia Phillies

PHI · NL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 310 749 −439 5th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 5.7% 14.7% −9.0% 5th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.4 -2.5 +0.1 13th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 5 — 10th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 508 927 −419 8th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 9.7% 17.4% −7.7% 8th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.0 3.9 +0.1 11th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 10.3 9.1 +1.2 7th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 14.4 12.8 +1.6 8th of 30
Total position-player WAR 15.7 15.4 +0.3 12th of 30
Total pitching WAR 19.7 12.2 +7.5 2nd of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 65.6% 62.7% +2.9% 10th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.47 0.42 +0.06 6th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 4 3 — 7th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 4th of 30
Hitters used 20 22 −2 24th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 30.5 28.4 +2.2 2nd of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 504 1178 −674 27th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 9.3% 23.2% −13.8% 27th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 361 320 +40 14th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 27 29 −2 23rd of 30
Rotation WAR 14.3 10.6 +3.7 6th of 30
Bullpen WAR 5.8 4.1 +1.7 8th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 13.0 7.5 +5.5 1st of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 67.0% 70.9% −4.0% 21st of 30
Quality starts 55 45 +9 5th of 30
Blown saves 20 20 — 15th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 16 0 +16 11th of 30
Run differential per game 0.12 0.00 +0.12 11th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.50 4.47 +0.03 15th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.38 4.47 −0.09 15th of 30
Winning percentage .550 .500 +.050 7th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .513 .502 +.012 11th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 4.8 -0.2 +5.0 3rd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .676 .499 +.177 1st of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .545 .500 +.046 11th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .545 .512 +.033 10th of 30
Home winning percentage .545 .527 +.018 11th of 30
Road winning percentage .556 .473 +.083 6th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .564 .502 +.062 7th of 30
Longest winning streak 7 6 — 8th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 129 128 — 6th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4849 4876 −27 17th of 30
Team At Bats 4322 4331 −9 17th of 30
Team Runs 581 576 +4 13th of 30
Team Hits 1044 1055 −11 20th of 30
Team Doubles 185 200 −15 24th of 30
Team Triples 21 17 +3 7th of 30
Team Home Runs 155 148 +7 12th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 562 551 +10 11th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 95 87 +7 12th of 30
Team Walks 416 435 −19 20th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1086 1078 +7 16th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.6% 8.9% −0.3% 18th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 22.4% 22.1% +0.3% 18th of 30
Team Batting Average .242 .243 −.001 18th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .313 .318 −.005 22nd of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .402 .400 +.002 15th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .715 .718 −.003 18th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 71 64 +6 7th of 30
Team Losses 58 64 −6 7th of 30
Team Saves 35 33 +1 13th of 30
Team Games 129 128 — 6th of 30
Team Games Started 129 128 — 6th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1145.2 1143.0 +2.1 10th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1272 1078 +193 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 10.0 8.5 +1.5 1st of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.1 3.4 −0.3 6th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.12 4.16 −0.04 16th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".