Add SportsStats to your home screen

Minnesota Twins

MIN · AL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 342 727 −385 6th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 6.8% 13.7% −6.9% 8th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.5 -2.6 +1.1 7th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 2 5 −3 2nd of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 771 947 −176 12th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 13.7% 17.0% −3.3% 12th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 2.6 4.1 −1.5 27th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 7.2 9.6 −2.4 27th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 11.0 13.3 −2.3 24th of 30
Total position-player WAR 15.9 16.1 −0.2 14th of 30
Total pitching WAR 10.5 12.6 −2.1 21st of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 45.3% 62.1% −16.9% 28th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.31 0.43 −0.11 30th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 3 3 — 14th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 0 0 — 20th of 30
Hitters used 19 22 −3 28th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.0 28.4 +0.6 12th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1078 1231 −153 14th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 21.6% 23.2% −1.7% 13th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 331 −331 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 31 30 — 11th of 30
Rotation WAR 9.3 10.9 −1.6 20th of 30
Bullpen WAR 2.9 4.3 −1.4 20th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 6.1 7.7 −1.6 26th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 60.7% 71.1% −10.4% 29th of 30
Quality starts 45 47 −2 19th of 30
Blown saves 21 21 — 15th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -56 0 −56 22nd of 30
Run differential per game -0.42 0.00 −0.42 22nd of 30
Runs scored per game 4.59 4.47 +0.12 9th of 30
Runs allowed per game 5.01 4.47 +0.54 27th of 30
Winning percentage .478 .500 −.022 20th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .460 .502 −.042 21st of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 2.4 -0.2 +2.6 11th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .424 .499 −.075 24th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .438 .500 −.062 22nd of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .571 .511 +.060 9th of 30
Home winning percentage .530 .528 +.002 15th of 30
Road winning percentage .426 .472 −.046 23rd of 30
Winning percentage within the division .514 .503 +.011 14th of 30
Longest winning streak 4 6 −2 24th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 134 134 — 7th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5066 5072 −6 12th of 30
Team At Bats 4515 4504 +10 14th of 30
Team Runs 615 599 +15 9th of 30
Team Hits 1108 1098 +9 15th of 30
Team Doubles 219 208 +10 9th of 30
Team Triples 19 18 — 13th of 30
Team Home Runs 155 153 +1 14th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 587 572 +14 11th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 76 90 −14 18th of 30
Team Walks 431 452 −21 21st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1072 1120 −48 9th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.5% 8.9% −0.4% 20th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.2% 22.1% −0.9% 7th of 30
Team Batting Average .245 .244 +.001 13th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .319 .318 +.001 11th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .405 .400 +.005 10th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .724 .718 +.006 12th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 64 67 −3 20th of 30
Team Losses 70 67 +2 18th of 30
Team Saves 38 34 +3 10th of 30
Team Games 134 134 — 7th of 30
Team Games Started 134 134 — 7th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1179.2 1188.2 −9.0 26th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 20th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1109 1120 −11 17th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.5 8.5 — 15th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.7 3.4 +0.3 20th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.69 4.16 +0.53 27th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".