Add SportsStats to your home screen

MLB · NL West

Los Angeles Dodgers

LAD · 2026

See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 298 961 −663 3rd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 4.6% 15.0% −10.4% 3rd of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.1 -2.9 +1.8 4th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 6 −1 8th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 974 1111 −137 18th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 14.4% 16.5% −2.1% 17th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.5 4.9 −0.4 16th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 12.3 11.4 +0.9 9th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 18.6 15.8 +2.8 5th of 30
Total position-player WAR 27.2 19.4 +7.8 2nd of 30
Total pitching WAR 29.1 15.1 +14.0 1st of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 45.2% 62.2% −17.0% 28th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.49 0.45 +0.04 8th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 4 — 6th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 1 — 3rd of 30
Hitters used 23 24 −1 19th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 31.5 28.3 +3.2 1st of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 564 1557 −993 28th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 8.7% 24.4% −15.7% 29th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 1566 397 +1168 1st of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 33 32 — 10th of 30
Rotation WAR 26.1 13.1 +13.0 1st of 30
Bullpen WAR 12.0 6.5 +5.5 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 12.8 8.8 +4.0 2nd of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 80.6% 71.5% +9.1% 2nd of 30
Quality starts 96 56 +39 1st of 30
Blown saves 25 26 −1 13th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 201 0 +201 2nd of 30
Run differential per game 1.24 0.00 +1.24 2nd of 30
Runs scored per game 4.94 4.48 +0.46 4th of 30
Runs allowed per game 3.70 4.48 −0.78 1st of 30
Winning percentage .617 .500 +.117 2nd of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .629 .502 +.127 2nd of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -1.9 -0.3 −1.6 20th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .574 .499 +.075 5th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .694 .500 +.194 2nd of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .857 .510 +.347 1st of 30
Home winning percentage .630 .529 +.101 4th of 30
Road winning percentage .605 .471 +.134 1st of 30
Winning percentage within the division .635 .500 +.135 2nd of 30
Longest winning streak 8 6 +1 6th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6214 6128 +85 4th of 30
Team At Bats 5451 5444 +6 14th of 30
Team Runs 801 725 +75 4th of 30
Team Hits 1399 1328 +70 4th of 30
Team Doubles 266 249 +16 8th of 30
Team Triples 18 22 −4 19th of 30
Team Home Runs 204 185 +18 7th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 756 693 +62 4th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 72 109 −37 28th of 30
Team Walks 628 544 +83 3rd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1267 1356 −89 4th of 30
Team Walk Rate 10.1% 8.9% +1.2% 3rd of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 20.4% 22.1% −1.7% 4th of 30
Team Batting Average .257 .244 +.013 3rd of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .338 .318 +.020 3rd of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .424 .400 +.024 2nd of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .762 .719 +.043 2nd of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 100 80 +19 2nd of 30
Team Losses 62 80 −18 2nd of 30
Team Saves 46 41 +4 7th of 30
Team Blown Saves 23 23 — 14th of 30
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1435.2 1435.2 — 19th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1521 1356 +164 4th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 9.5 8.5 +1.0 4th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.0 3.4 −0.4 4th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.55 4.17 −0.62 4th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".