Add SportsStats to your home screen

Arizona Diamondbacks

AZ · NL West · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1074 752 +321 22nd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 21.0% 14.7% +6.3% 23rd of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -3.6 -2.5 −1.1 27th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 9 5 +3 26th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 2431 931 +1499 30th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 43.9% 17.3% +26.6% 30th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.1 3.9 +0.2 9th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 11.3 9.1 +2.2 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 15.6 12.8 +2.8 5th of 30
Total position-player WAR 15.3 15.4 −0.1 16th of 30
Total pitching WAR 7.0 12.2 −5.2 25th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 73.9% 62.7% +11.2% 6th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.46 0.42 +0.05 8th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 3 +1 1st of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 0 +1 1st of 30
Hitters used 24 22 +1 7th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.1 28.4 +0.7 11th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 831 1189 −358 18th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 16.3% 23.2% −6.9% 19th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 1022 322 +699 3rd of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 30 29 — 14th of 30
Rotation WAR 4.5 10.6 −6.1 28th of 30
Bullpen WAR 3.1 4.1 −1.0 21st of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 6.1 7.5 −1.4 25th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 65.5% 70.9% −5.4% 24th of 30
Quality starts 48 45 +2 13th of 30
Blown saves 17 20 −3 8th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 7 0 +7 15th of 30
Run differential per game 0.05 0.00 +0.05 15th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.56 4.47 +0.09 10th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.51 4.47 +0.04 19th of 30
Winning percentage .523 .500 +.023 10th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .505 .501 +.004 15th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 2.3 -0.2 +2.5 9th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .550 .498 +.052 8th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .486 .499 −.013 14th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .462 .512 −.050 18th of 30
Home winning percentage .569 .528 +.042 9th of 30
Road winning percentage .477 .472 +.004 14th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .619 .502 +.117 4th of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 18th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 130 129 — 6th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4930 4913 +16 8th of 30
Team At Bats 4369 4365 +3 15th of 30
Team Runs 593 580 +12 10th of 30
Team Hits 1069 1063 +5 16th of 30
Team Doubles 226 201 +24 5th of 30
Team Triples 33 17 +15 1st of 30
Team Home Runs 129 149 −20 26th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 565 555 +9 12th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 89 87 +1 13th of 30
Team Walks 439 438 — 14th of 30
Team Strikeouts 944 1086 −142 2nd of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.9% 8.9% — 14th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 19.1% 22.1% −3.0% 2nd of 30
Team Batting Average .245 .244 +.001 13th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .318 .318 — 11th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .400 .400 — 17th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .718 .718 — 15th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 68 64 +3 10th of 30
Team Losses 62 64 −2 10th of 30
Team Saves 31 33 −2 20th of 30
Team Games 130 129 — 6th of 30
Team Games Started 130 129 — 6th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1154.0 1152.0 +1.2 12th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 881 1086 −205 29th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 6.9 8.5 −1.6 29th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.0 3.4 −0.4 4th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.20 4.16 +0.04 18th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".