Portland Beavers
POR · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League Pacific Northern · 2010Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 46 | 29 | +16 | 6th of 45 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 26.6 | 28.4 | −1.8 | 38th of 45 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1427 | 1273 | +153 | 18th of 45 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 25.1% | 24.6% | +0.5% | 22nd of 45 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 373 | −373 | 39th of 45 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 32 | 26 | +5 | 7th of 45 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 78.3% | 73.2% | +5.1% | 5th of 45 |
|
| Blown saves | 15 | 18 | −3 | 13th of 45 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -74 | 0 | −73 | 39th of 45 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.63 | -0.01 | −0.62 | 39th of 45 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.28 | 5.00 | −0.72 | 37th of 45 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.91 | 5.00 | −0.09 | 23rd of 45 |
|
| Winning percentage | .415 | .499 | −.084 | 39th of 45 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .438 | .499 | −.061 | 39th of 45 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.7 | 0.0 | −2.7 | 36th of 45 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .450 | .503 | −.053 | 34th of 45 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .357 | .499 | −.142 | 39th of 45 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .521 | −.021 | 22nd of 45 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .345 | .546 | −.201 | 45th of 45 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .483 | .453 | +.030 | 20th of 45 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .417 | .501 | −.084 | 38th of 44 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 5 | — | 15th of 45 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".