Omaha Storm Chasers
OMA · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 28 | 26 | +1 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.8 | 26.9 | +1.8 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 647 | 1407 | −760 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 15.1% | 34.5% | −19.3% | 26th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 140 | 73 | +66 | 9th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 40 | 36 | +3 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 66.4% | 71.6% | −5.2% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 31 | 17 | +13 | 30th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -67 | 0 | −67 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.64 | 0.00 | −0.64 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.24 | 5.41 | −0.17 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.88 | 5.41 | +0.47 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .471 | .500 | −.029 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .447 | .501 | −.054 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 2.5 | -0.1 | +2.6 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .357 | .506 | −.149 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .452 | .501 | −.049 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .222 | .496 | −.274 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .481 | .517 | −.036 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .460 | .484 | −.024 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .422 | .502 | −.080 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".