FCL Twins
F-TWI · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 23 | 19 | +3 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 19.2 | 18.9 | +0.4 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2010 | 1762 | +247 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 98.7% | 99.2% | −0.5% | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 42 | 25 | +16 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 56.0% | 61.1% | −5.1% | 58th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 8 | +1 | 55th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 22 | 0 | +22 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.37 | -0.00 | +0.37 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.58 | 6.25 | −0.67 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.20 | 6.26 | −1.06 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .559 | .500 | +.059 | 31st of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .532 | .502 | +.030 | 35th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.6 | -0.1 | +1.7 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .493 | +.007 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .503 | −.003 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .527 | −.527 | 39th of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .667 | .559 | +.108 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .448 | .440 | +.008 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .559 | .500 | +.058 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 4 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".