FCL Orioles
F-ORI · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 30 | 20 | +9 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 19.8 | 18.9 | +0.9 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1888 | 2065 | −177 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 97.4% | 99.2% | −1.8% | 70th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 38 | 26 | +11 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 73.3% | 62.9% | +10.4% | 9th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 9 | −1 | 24th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 14 | 0 | +14 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.25 | 0.00 | +0.25 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.63 | 6.21 | −0.58 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.38 | 6.21 | −0.83 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .589 | .500 | +.089 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .521 | .503 | +.018 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 3.8 | -0.2 | +4.0 | 8th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .471 | .494 | −.023 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .503 | −.003 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .523 | −.523 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .586 | .558 | +.028 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .593 | .442 | +.151 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .589 | .501 | +.088 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 9 | 5 | +3 | 7th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".