FCL Mets
F-MET · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 30 | 20 | +9 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.1 | 18.9 | +1.3 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1764 | 2090 | −326 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 98.4% | 99.2% | −0.7% | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 12 | 0 | +11 | 2nd of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 29 | 26 | +2 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 67.5% | 63.1% | +4.4% | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 6 | 9 | −3 | 6th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -84 | 0 | −84 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.53 | -0.00 | −1.53 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.69 | 6.20 | −1.51 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.22 | 6.20 | +0.02 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .436 | .500 | −.064 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .374 | .503 | −.129 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 3.4 | -0.2 | +3.6 | 9th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .611 | .495 | +.116 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .333 | .502 | −.168 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .536 | .556 | −.020 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .333 | .444 | −.111 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .436 | .501 | −.065 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 64th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".