DSL White Sox
D-WSX · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 19 | −4 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.9 | 18.9 | −1.0 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1463 | 1789 | −326 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 22 | 25 | −3 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 60.3% | 61.4% | −1.1% | 44th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 5 | 8 | −3 | 9th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -66 | 0 | −66 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.53 | -0.00 | −1.53 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.70 | 6.25 | −0.55 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.23 | 6.25 | +0.98 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .372 | .500 | −.128 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .393 | .502 | −.109 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.9 | -0.1 | −0.8 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .545 | .493 | +.052 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .333 | .503 | −.170 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .527 | −.527 | 39th of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .545 | .559 | −.014 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .190 | .440 | −.250 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .320 | .501 | −.181 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".