DSL Royals Fortuna
D-ROF · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 19 | −3 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.1 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1592 | 1885 | −293 | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 20 | 25 | −5 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 48.8% | 62.0% | −13.2% | 78th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 2 | 8 | −6 | 1st of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 13 | 0 | +13 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.28 | -0.00 | +0.28 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.52 | 6.23 | −0.71 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.24 | 6.24 | −1.00 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .630 | .500 | +.130 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .524 | .503 | +.021 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 4.9 | -0.1 | +5.0 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .714 | .493 | +.221 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .538 | .504 | +.034 | 35th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .533 | −.533 | 41st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .609 | .560 | +.049 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .652 | .440 | +.212 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .630 | .501 | +.129 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 9th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".