DSL Pirates Gold
D-PIG · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 22 | 20 | +1 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.9 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2238 | 2090 | +147 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 28 | 26 | +1 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 61.8% | 63.1% | −1.3% | 48th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 9 | +2 | 56th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 2 | 0 | +2 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.04 | -0.00 | +0.04 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.30 | 6.20 | +0.10 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.26 | 6.20 | +0.06 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .415 | .500 | −.085 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .503 | .503 | — | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.7 | -0.2 | −4.5 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .333 | .495 | −.162 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .502 | −.002 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .536 | .556 | −.020 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .280 | .444 | −.164 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .310 | .501 | −.191 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 47th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".