DSL Phillies
D-PHI · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.1 | 18.9 | −0.8 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2115 | 2137 | −22 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 61.9% | 63.4% | −1.5% | 45th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 7 | 10 | −3 | 12th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 46 | 0 | +46 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.82 | -0.00 | +0.82 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.64 | 6.20 | +1.44 | 8th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.82 | 6.20 | +0.62 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .643 | .500 | +.143 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .552 | .503 | +.049 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 5.1 | -0.2 | +5.3 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .800 | .495 | +.305 | 1st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .632 | .501 | +.131 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .667 | .525 | +.142 | 26th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .679 | .557 | +.122 | 14th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .607 | .442 | +.165 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .688 | .501 | +.187 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 15th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".