DSL Brewers Blue
D-BWB · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Northwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 14 | 20 | −6 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.9 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1764 | 1910 | −146 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 25 | −7 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 74.6% | 62.2% | +12.4% | 9th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 4 | 8 | −4 | 2nd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 45 | 0 | +45 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.94 | -0.00 | +0.94 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.25 | 6.22 | +1.03 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.31 | 6.23 | +0.08 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .563 | .500 | +.063 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .563 | .502 | +.060 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.0 | -0.1 | +0.1 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .467 | .492 | −.025 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .722 | .503 | +.219 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .533 | +.467 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .667 | .560 | +.107 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .458 | .439 | +.019 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .484 | .501 | −.017 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 9th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".