DSL Arizona Black
D-ARB · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 18 | 20 | −2 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.1 | 18.9 | −0.8 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1974 | 2137 | −163 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 25 | 26 | −1 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 61.5% | 63.4% | −1.9% | 47th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 10 | −2 | 20th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 31 | 0 | +31 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.56 | -0.00 | +0.56 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.87 | 6.20 | −0.33 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.31 | 6.20 | −0.89 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .545 | .500 | +.045 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .546 | .503 | +.043 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.0 | -0.2 | +0.2 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .529 | .495 | +.034 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .474 | .500 | −.026 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .643 | .557 | +.086 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .444 | .442 | +.002 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .563 | .501 | +.062 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 5 | — | 23rd of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".