DSL Angels
D-ANG · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.9 | 65th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1756 | 1947 | −191 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 16 | 25 | −9 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 64.6% | 62.4% | +2.2% | 30th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 9 | +2 | 63rd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 17 | 0 | +17 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.35 | -0.00 | +0.35 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.63 | 6.21 | +0.42 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.27 | 6.22 | +0.05 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .583 | .500 | +.083 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .525 | .502 | +.022 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 2.8 | -0.1 | +2.9 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .545 | .492 | +.053 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .588 | .503 | +.085 | 30th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .524 | −.524 | 41st of 59 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .560 | .560 | — | 41st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .609 | .440 | +.169 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .593 | .501 | +.092 | 23rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 11 | 5 | +5 | 3rd of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".