Brooklyn Cyclones
BRK · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 34 | 26 | +7 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.0 | 22.7 | +0.3 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4404 | 4079 | +324 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 91.7% | 94.4% | −2.7% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 46 | 33 | +12 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 68.6% | 63.7% | +4.9% | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 17 | — | 12th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -17 | 0 | −17 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.15 | 0.00 | −0.15 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.44 | 5.55 | −1.11 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.59 | 5.55 | −0.96 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .436 | .500 | −.064 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .484 | .501 | −.017 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -5.2 | -0.1 | −5.1 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .310 | .498 | −.188 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .559 | .499 | +.060 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .300 | .508 | −.208 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .509 | .522 | −.013 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .358 | .478 | −.120 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .457 | .509 | −.052 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 24th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".