ACL Giants
A-GIA · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 28 | 20 | +7 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.4 | 18.9 | +1.5 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2076 | 2137 | −61 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 96.6% | 99.2% | −2.6% | 75th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 31 | 26 | +4 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 71.1% | 63.4% | +7.7% | 16th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 7 | 10 | −3 | 12th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 39 | 0 | +39 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.65 | -0.00 | +0.65 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.77 | 6.20 | −0.43 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.12 | 6.20 | −1.08 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .567 | .500 | +.067 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .554 | .503 | +.051 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.8 | -0.2 | +1.0 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .643 | .495 | +.148 | 12th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .526 | .500 | +.026 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .633 | .557 | +.076 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .500 | .442 | +.058 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .600 | .501 | +.099 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 5 | — | 23rd of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".