Add SportsStats to your home screen

Miami Marlins

MIA · NL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 866 889 −23 17th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 14.7% 14.5% +0.2% 19th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.8 -2.8 — 17th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 6 −1 10th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 702 1083 −381 11th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 12.0% 17.0% −5.0% 11th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.3 4.6 +0.7 6th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 10.1 10.8 −0.7 17th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 14.3 14.9 −0.6 14th of 30
Total position-player WAR 18.6 18.3 +0.3 11th of 30
Total pitching WAR 13.2 14.4 −1.2 18th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 54.3% 62.0% −7.7% 20th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.42 0.44 −0.02 21st of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 4 — 6th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 6th of 30
Hitters used 20 23 −3 27th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 26.3 28.3 −2.0 27th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 2165 1471 +694 8th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 36.8% 24.0% +12.8% 7th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 381 −381 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 27 31 −4 26th of 30
Rotation WAR 10.7 12.5 −1.8 19th of 30
Bullpen WAR 8.7 5.7 +3.0 5th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 7.6 8.5 −0.9 17th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 72.5% 71.2% +1.3% 15th of 30
Quality starts 46 54 −8 22nd of 30
Blown saves 24 25 −1 13th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 1 0 +1 14th of 30
Run differential per game 0.01 0.00 +0.01 14th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.45 4.49 −0.04 15th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.44 4.49 −0.05 14th of 30
Winning percentage .490 .500 −.010 17th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .501 .502 −.001 14th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -1.7 -0.2 −1.5 18th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .500 .499 +.001 14th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .452 .499 −.047 20th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .300 .510 −.210 27th of 30
Home winning percentage .577 .530 +.047 7th of 30
Road winning percentage .403 .471 −.068 24th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .449 .501 −.052 23rd of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 — 13th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 155 154 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5868 5867 — 12th of 30
Team At Bats 5177 5210 −33 22nd of 30
Team Runs 689 696 −7 16th of 30
Team Hits 1291 1272 +18 11th of 30
Team Doubles 237 239 −2 16th of 30
Team Triples 35 21 +13 3rd of 30
Team Home Runs 160 178 −18 23rd of 30
Team Runs Batted In 659 665 −6 16th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 159 105 +53 2nd of 30
Team Walks 534 522 +11 12th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1290 1296 −6 16th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.1% 8.9% +0.2% 11th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 22.0% 22.1% −0.1% 18th of 30
Team Batting Average .249 .244 +.005 7th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .327 .319 +.008 6th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .401 .401 — 15th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .728 .720 +.008 8th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 76 77 −1 16th of 30
Team Losses 79 77 +1 16th of 30
Team Saves 33 40 −7 25th of 30
Team Games 155 154 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 155 154 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1364.1 1374.0 −9.2 27th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 22nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1259 1296 −37 19th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.3 8.5 −0.2 17th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.6 3.4 +0.2 19th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.14 4.18 −0.04 15th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".