Add SportsStats to your home screen

Houston Astros

HOU · AL West · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 498 961 −463 8th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 7.4% 15.0% −7.7% 7th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.5 -2.9 +1.4 6th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 6 −1 8th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1627 1111 +515 23rd of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 26.6% 16.5% +10.1% 24th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 6.8 4.9 +1.9 3rd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 14.6 11.4 +3.2 2nd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 17.9 15.8 +2.1 7th of 30
Total position-player WAR 22.7 19.4 +3.3 8th of 30
Total pitching WAR 7.6 15.1 −7.5 25th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 64.3% 62.3% +2.0% 13th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.48 0.45 +0.04 9th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 3 4 −1 26th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 1 — 3rd of 30
Hitters used 28 24 +4 2nd of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.4 28.3 +1.1 6th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1038 1557 −519 20th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 15.4% 24.4% −9.0% 21st of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 1474 397 +1076 2nd of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 33 32 — 10th of 30
Rotation WAR 5.8 13.1 −7.3 29th of 30
Bullpen WAR 1.5 6.5 −5.0 26th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 5.5 8.8 −3.3 28th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 75.6% 71.5% +4.0% 10th of 30
Quality starts 44 56 −12 26th of 30
Blown saves 14 26 −12 1st of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -32 0 −32 19th of 30
Run differential per game -0.20 0.00 −0.20 19th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.53 4.48 +0.05 13th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.73 4.48 +0.25 24th of 30
Winning percentage .500 .500 — 14th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .480 .502 −.022 19th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 3.2 -0.3 +3.5 8th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .455 .499 −.044 18th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .381 .500 −.119 26th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .467 .510 −.043 20th of 30
Home winning percentage .481 .529 −.048 21st of 30
Road winning percentage .519 .471 +.048 9th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .500 .500 — 14th of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 — 13th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6122 6128 −6 14th of 30
Team At Bats 5457 5444 +12 13th of 30
Team Runs 734 725 +8 13th of 30
Team Hits 1320 1328 −8 17th of 30
Team Doubles 238 249 −11 20th of 30
Team Triples 21 22 −1 15th of 30
Team Home Runs 226 185 +40 1st of 30
Team Runs Batted In 701 693 +7 12th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 50 109 −59 30th of 30
Team Walks 530 544 −14 16th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1343 1356 −13 15th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.7% 8.9% −0.2% 16th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.9% 22.1% −0.2% 16th of 30
Team Batting Average .242 .244 −.002 18th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .315 .318 −.003 19th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .417 .400 +.017 4th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .732 .719 +.013 7th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 81 80 — 14th of 30
Team Losses 81 80 — 14th of 30
Team Saves 49 41 +7 4th of 30
Team Blown Saves 14 23 −9 1st of 30
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1437.0 1435.2 +1.0 14th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1411 1356 +54 9th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.8 8.5 +0.3 9th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 4.1 3.4 +0.7 29th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.45 4.17 +0.28 24th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".