Add SportsStats to your home screen

Houston Astros

HOU · AL West · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 363 762 −399 5th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 6.9% 15.1% −8.2% 5th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.3 -2.5 +1.2 6th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 5 — 9th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1488 943 +544 24th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 31.0% 17.9% +13.1% 25th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.7 3.9 +1.8 3rd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 11.6 9.0 +2.6 3rd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 14.9 12.7 +2.2 7th of 30
Total position-player WAR 18.2 15.1 +3.1 7th of 30
Total pitching WAR 5.0 11.9 −6.9 27th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 63.7% 63.0% +0.7% 12th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.53 0.42 +0.11 2nd of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 3 3 — 15th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 3rd of 30
Hitters used 27 22 +4 1st of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.5 28.4 +1.1 6th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 719 1161 −442 23rd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 13.6% 23.1% −9.5% 24th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 1167 316 +850 2nd of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 31 29 +1 10th of 30
Rotation WAR 3.3 10.4 −7.1 29th of 30
Bullpen WAR 1.4 4.0 −2.6 24th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 3.9 7.4 −3.5 28th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 73.3% 70.9% +2.4% 12th of 30
Quality starts 36 45 −9 26th of 30
Blown saves 8 20 −12 1st of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -31 0 −31 18th of 30
Run differential per game -0.24 0.00 −0.24 18th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.57 4.48 +0.09 11th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.81 4.48 +0.33 25th of 30
Winning percentage .504 .500 +.004 13th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .476 .501 −.025 18th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 3.5 -0.1 +3.6 7th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .542 .500 +.042 9th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .361 .499 −.138 26th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .538 .512 +.026 14th of 30
Home winning percentage .500 .524 −.024 18th of 30
Road winning percentage .508 .476 +.032 11th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .500 .502 −.002 15th of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 — 10th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 127 127 — 14th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4804 4816 −12 17th of 30
Team At Bats 4272 4278 −6 18th of 30
Team Runs 580 570 +9 10th of 30
Team Hits 1035 1042 −7 18th of 30
Team Doubles 184 197 −13 23rd of 30
Team Triples 13 17 −4 19th of 30
Team Home Runs 170 146 +23 3rd of 30
Team Runs Batted In 553 545 +7 11th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 40 86 −46 29th of 30
Team Walks 423 429 −6 15th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1033 1064 −31 9th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.8% 8.9% −0.1% 16th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.5% 22.1% −0.6% 9th of 30
Team Batting Average .242 .244 −.002 18th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .317 .318 −.001 15th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .411 .401 +.010 6th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .728 .719 +.009 9th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 64 63 — 13th of 30
Team Losses 63 63 — 12th of 30
Team Saves 39 33 +5 4th of 30
Team Games 127 127 — 14th of 30
Team Games Started 127 127 — 14th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1127.1 1129.0 −1.2 17th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1109 1064 +44 9th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.9 8.5 +0.4 9th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 4.2 3.4 +0.8 28th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.55 4.17 +0.38 25th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".