Add SportsStats to your home screen

Cleveland Guardians

CLE · AL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 906 907 −1 16th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 13.4% 14.6% −1.2% 13th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.6 -2.9 +0.3 14th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 6 6 — 13th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 518 1084 −566 4th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 8.0% 16.7% −8.8% 4th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 3.5 4.7 −1.2 26th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 10.2 11.0 −0.8 19th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 15.2 15.2 — 13th of 30
Total position-player WAR 18.4 18.7 −0.3 17th of 30
Total pitching WAR 19.8 14.5 +5.3 7th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 55.4% 62.0% −6.5% 19th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.48 0.44 +0.04 9th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 4 — 6th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 0 1 −1 22nd of 30
Hitters used 24 24 — 13th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 27.6 28.3 −0.7 22nd of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 2527 1504 +1022 4th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 37.5% 24.2% +13.2% 6th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 386 −386 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 25 31 −6 29th of 30
Rotation WAR 14.5 12.7 +1.8 9th of 30
Bullpen WAR 7.9 6.0 +1.9 9th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 10.6 8.5 +2.1 7th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 65.9% 71.3% −5.5% 25th of 30
Quality starts 69 55 +13 3rd of 30
Blown saves 17 25 −8 3rd of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 3 0 +3 15th of 30
Run differential per game 0.02 0.00 +0.02 15th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.15 4.48 −0.33 26th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.13 4.48 −0.35 8th of 30
Winning percentage .522 .500 +.022 11th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .502 .502 — 15th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 3.2 -0.3 +3.5 9th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .565 .499 +.066 8th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .548 .499 +.049 11th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .583 .511 +.072 8th of 30
Home winning percentage .506 .529 −.023 19th of 30
Road winning percentage .539 .471 +.068 6th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .551 .501 +.050 10th of 30
Longest winning streak 7 6 — 11th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 157 157 — 5th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5921 5948 −27 17th of 30
Team At Bats 5240 5283 −43 24th of 30
Team Runs 652 704 −52 26th of 30
Team Hits 1250 1288 −38 24th of 30
Team Doubles 243 242 — 15th of 30
Team Triples 14 21 −7 25th of 30
Team Home Runs 152 180 −28 27th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 624 673 −49 26th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 142 106 +35 7th of 30
Team Walks 552 529 +22 9th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1242 1315 −73 6th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.3% 8.9% +0.4% 8th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.0% 22.1% −1.1% 7th of 30
Team Batting Average .239 .244 −.005 23rd of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .316 .318 −.002 15th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .377 .400 −.023 29th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .693 .719 −.026 27th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 82 78 +3 11th of 30
Team Losses 75 78 −3 11th of 30
Team Saves 45 40 +4 8th of 30
Team Games 157 157 — 5th of 30
Team Games Started 157 157 — 5th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1394.2 1393.2 +0.2 15th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1488 1315 +172 3rd of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 9.6 8.5 +1.1 2nd of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.3 3.4 −0.1 12th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.77 4.17 −0.40 8th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".