Wilmington Blue Rocks
WIL · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 25 | 28 | −3 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 22.2 | 22.7 | −0.5 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4328 | 4863 | −535 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 91.5% | 94.9% | −3.4% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 40 | 36 | +3 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 69.4% | 65.0% | +4.4% | 7th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 28 | 21 | +7 | 29th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 15 | 0 | +15 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.12 | 0.00 | +0.12 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.05 | 5.55 | −0.50 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.93 | 5.54 | −0.61 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .523 | .500 | +.023 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .511 | .501 | +.010 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.6 | -0.1 | +1.7 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .528 | .497 | +.031 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .545 | .502 | +.043 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .625 | .513 | +.112 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .594 | .518 | +.076 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .455 | .482 | −.027 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .560 | .509 | +.051 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 6 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".