Toledo Mud Hens
TOL · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 33 | 29 | +3 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.4 | 26.9 | +0.5 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1115 | 1718 | −603 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 21.4% | 35.1% | −13.7% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 258 | 84 | +173 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 48 | 40 | +7 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 84.6% | 72.7% | +12.0% | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 15 | 21 | −6 | 4th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 21 | 0 | +21 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.17 | 0.00 | +0.17 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.07 | 5.41 | −0.34 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.89 | 5.41 | −0.52 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .479 | .500 | −.021 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .516 | .501 | +.015 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.4 | -0.1 | −4.3 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .502 | −.002 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .550 | .500 | +.050 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .333 | .511 | −.178 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .508 | .518 | −.010 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .452 | .482 | −.030 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .470 | .501 | −.031 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 5 | — | 12th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".