Sugar Land Space Cowboys
SUG · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 34 | 28 | +5 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.8 | 26.9 | +1.9 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 365 | 1613 | −1248 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 7.6% | 35.2% | −27.6% | 28th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 238 | 81 | +156 | 5th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 40 | 39 | — | 12th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 71.3% | 72.4% | −1.1% | 14th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 16 | 20 | −4 | 7th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -14 | 0 | −14 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.12 | 0.00 | −0.12 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.79 | 5.44 | −0.65 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.91 | 5.43 | −0.52 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .518 | .500 | +.018 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .488 | .501 | −.013 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 3.4 | -0.1 | +3.5 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .579 | .503 | +.076 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .421 | .500 | −.079 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .692 | .505 | +.187 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .589 | .518 | +.071 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .448 | .482 | −.034 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .475 | .502 | −.027 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 6th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".