Scranton/WB RailRiders
SWB · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 29 | 32 | −3 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 26.8 | 26.9 | −0.1 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1863 | 2144 | −281 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 32.6% | 35.3% | −2.7% | 19th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 283 | 104 | +178 | 4th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 39 | 45 | −6 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 78.1% | 73.8% | +4.3% | 7th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 28 | 27 | — | 18th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 57 | 0 | +57 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.39 | -0.00 | +0.39 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.26 | 5.32 | −0.06 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.86 | 5.32 | −0.46 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .531 | .500 | +.031 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .536 | .501 | +.035 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.7 | -0.1 | −0.6 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .595 | .502 | +.093 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .535 | .501 | +.034 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .462 | .510 | −.048 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .563 | .517 | +.046 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .500 | .483 | +.017 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .512 | .500 | +.012 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 6 | +1 | 4th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".