Scranton/WB RailRiders
SWB · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 28 | 31 | −3 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 26.8 | 26.9 | −0.1 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1758 | 1976 | −218 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 32.9% | 35.0% | −2.0% | 18th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 283 | 91 | +191 | 4th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 39 | 43 | −4 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 77.6% | 73.5% | +4.2% | 9th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 27 | 25 | +1 | 18th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 78 | 0 | +78 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.59 | 0.00 | +0.59 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.33 | 5.36 | −0.03 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.74 | 5.36 | −0.62 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .549 | .500 | +.049 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .553 | .501 | +.052 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.5 | -0.1 | −0.4 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .600 | .503 | +.097 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .561 | .502 | +.059 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .462 | .506 | −.044 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .576 | .516 | +.060 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .522 | .485 | +.037 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .530 | .502 | +.028 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 6 | +1 | 4th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".