Sacramento River Cats
SAC · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 39 | 32 | +6 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 25.9 | 26.9 | −1.0 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3135 | 2176 | +958 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 47.3% | 35.4% | +11.9% | 7th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 105 | −105 | 17th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 49 | 45 | +3 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 68.7% | 73.8% | −5.1% | 25th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 27 | 27 | — | 15th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 92 | 0 | +92 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.63 | 0.00 | +0.63 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.59 | 5.31 | +0.28 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.97 | 5.31 | −0.34 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .537 | .500 | +.037 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .554 | .501 | +.053 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.4 | -0.1 | −2.3 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .471 | .503 | −.032 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .609 | .501 | +.108 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .507 | −.007 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .548 | .516 | +.032 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .527 | .485 | +.042 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .511 | .501 | +.010 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 6 | — | 7th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".