Sacramento River Cats
SAC · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 30 | 28 | +1 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 25.8 | 26.9 | −1.1 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2192 | 1584 | +607 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 48.3% | 35.1% | +13.2% | 8th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 79 | −79 | 16th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 36 | 38 | −2 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 70.0% | 72.0% | −2.0% | 17th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 19 | 19 | — | 15th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 101 | 0 | +101 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.92 | 0.00 | +0.92 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.81 | 5.43 | +0.38 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.89 | 5.43 | −0.54 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .573 | .500 | +.073 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .578 | .501 | +.077 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.6 | -0.1 | −0.5 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .522 | .503 | +.019 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .658 | .500 | +.158 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .625 | .502 | +.123 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .593 | .518 | +.075 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .554 | .482 | +.072 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .569 | .502 | +.067 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 6th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".