Nashville Sounds
NAS · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 32 | 32 | — | 18th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 25.2 | 26.9 | −1.7 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3108 | 2176 | +931 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 47.9% | 35.4% | +12.5% | 6th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 105 | −105 | 17th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 42 | 45 | −3 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 71.9% | 73.8% | −1.9% | 18th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 22 | 27 | −5 | 8th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 33 | 0 | +33 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.22 | -0.00 | +0.22 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.88 | 5.31 | −0.43 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.66 | 5.31 | −0.65 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .534 | .500 | +.034 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .521 | .501 | +.020 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.9 | -0.1 | +2.0 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .525 | .503 | +.022 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .501 | −.001 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .200 | .507 | −.307 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .627 | .516 | +.111 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .438 | .484 | −.046 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .542 | .500 | +.042 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 9 | 6 | +2 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".