Monterrey Sultanes
MTY · Mexican League Mexican League Madero · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 18 | 32 | −14 | 40th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 32.7 | 28.1 | +4.6 | 1st of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 99 | 1534 | −1435 | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2.0% | 29.4% | −27.4% | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 1148 | 387 | +760 | 4th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 20 | 32 | −12 | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 65.0% | 71.3% | −6.3% | 37th of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 21 | 19 | +1 | 24th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 66 | 0 | +66 | 13th of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.88 | -0.01 | +0.89 | 12th of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.35 | 5.68 | +0.67 | 11th of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.47 | 5.69 | −0.22 | 21st of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .573 | .500 | +.073 | 10th of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .568 | .500 | +.068 | 13th of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.4 | -0.0 | +0.4 | 19th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .526 | .504 | +.022 | 15th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .650 | .499 | +.151 | 10th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .667 | .507 | +.160 | 10th of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .711 | .519 | +.192 | 1st of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .432 | .483 | −.051 | 29th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .500 | .506 | −.006 | 25th of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 5 | — | 14th of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".