Lehigh Valley IronPigs
LHV · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 31 | 32 | −1 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.9 | 26.9 | +1.0 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1916 | 2127 | −211 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 31.2% | 35.2% | −4.0% | 20th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 260 | 103 | +156 | 7th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 45 | 44 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 72.0% | 73.8% | −1.8% | 17th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 27 | −10 | 1st of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -116 | 0 | −116 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.79 | -0.00 | −0.79 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.84 | 5.32 | −0.48 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.64 | 5.33 | +0.31 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .459 | .500 | −.041 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .431 | .501 | −.070 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 4.1 | -0.1 | +4.2 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .444 | .503 | −.059 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .300 | .501 | −.201 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .545 | .508 | +.037 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .520 | .516 | +.004 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .394 | .484 | −.090 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .451 | .501 | −.050 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 6 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".