Laguna Vaqueros
LAG · Mexican League Mexican League Madero · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 25 | 32 | −7 | 27th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.4 | 28.1 | +0.3 | 19th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2032 | 1534 | +497 | 12th of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 43.4% | 29.4% | +14.0% | 9th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 704 | 387 | +316 | 11th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 29 | 32 | −3 | 30th of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 77.6% | 71.3% | +6.3% | 7th of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 19 | −2 | 9th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -239 | 0 | −238 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | -3.10 | -0.01 | −3.09 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.38 | 5.68 | −0.30 | 26th of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 8.48 | 5.69 | +2.79 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .312 | .500 | −.188 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .303 | .500 | −.197 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.7 | -0.0 | +0.7 | 15th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .526 | .504 | +.022 | 15th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .152 | .499 | −.347 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .507 | −.007 | 18th of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .351 | .519 | −.168 | 42nd of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .275 | .483 | −.208 | 44th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .316 | .506 | −.190 | 40th of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 32nd of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".