DSL Rays
D-RAY · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2250 | 2137 | +112 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 26 | 26 | — | 38th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 55.0% | 63.4% | −8.4% | 67th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 15 | 10 | +4 | 74th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 4 | 0 | +4 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.07 | -0.00 | +0.07 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.44 | 6.20 | +0.24 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.37 | 6.20 | +0.17 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .444 | .500 | −.056 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .505 | .503 | +.002 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.3 | -0.2 | −3.1 | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .364 | .495 | −.131 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .588 | .500 | +.088 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .481 | .557 | −.076 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .407 | .442 | −.036 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .581 | .501 | +.080 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 47th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".