DSL Mariners
D-MRN · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.3 | 18.9 | −0.6 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1849 | 1910 | −61 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 20 | 25 | −5 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 56.6% | 62.2% | −5.7% | 57th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 8 | +8 | 80th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 42 | 0 | +42 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.86 | -0.00 | +0.86 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.88 | 6.22 | +0.66 | 22nd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.02 | 6.23 | −0.21 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .571 | .500 | +.071 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .561 | .502 | +.058 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.5 | -0.1 | +0.6 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .492 | +.008 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .667 | .503 | +.164 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .250 | .533 | −.283 | 38th of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .680 | .560 | +.120 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .458 | .439 | +.019 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .517 | .501 | +.016 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".