DSL LAD Mega
D-LAM · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Northwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 20 | −5 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.7 | 18.9 | −0.2 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1702 | 1910 | −208 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 21 | 25 | −4 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 63.3% | 62.2% | +1.1% | 35th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 13 | 8 | +4 | 71st of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -40 | 0 | −40 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.87 | -0.00 | −0.87 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.74 | 6.22 | +0.52 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.61 | 6.23 | +1.38 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .457 | .500 | −.043 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .445 | .502 | −.058 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.5 | -0.1 | +0.6 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .492 | +.008 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .412 | .503 | −.091 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .533 | −.533 | 41st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .560 | −.060 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .409 | .439 | −.030 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .429 | .501 | −.072 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 61st of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".