DSL CLE Mendoza
D-CLM · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Northwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 14 | 20 | −6 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.8 | 18.9 | −1.1 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1779 | 1910 | −131 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 25 | −7 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 46.6% | 62.2% | −15.6% | 79th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 8 | — | 31st of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -23 | 0 | −23 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.48 | -0.00 | −0.48 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.50 | 6.22 | +1.28 | 9th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.98 | 6.23 | +1.75 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .417 | .500 | −.083 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .472 | .502 | −.030 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.7 | -0.1 | −2.6 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .364 | .492 | −.128 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .350 | .503 | −.153 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .533 | +.467 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .520 | .560 | −.040 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .304 | .439 | −.135 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .444 | .501 | −.057 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 61st of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".