DSL CLE Mendoza
D-CLM · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Northwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 20 | −5 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.8 | 18.9 | −1.1 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2156 | 2137 | +18 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 19 | 26 | −7 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 53.6% | 63.4% | −9.8% | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 10 | −2 | 20th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -27 | 0 | −27 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.49 | -0.00 | −0.49 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.31 | 6.20 | +1.11 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.80 | 6.20 | +1.60 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .418 | .500 | −.082 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .470 | .503 | −.033 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.8 | -0.2 | −2.6 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .364 | .496 | −.132 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .360 | .500 | −.140 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .536 | .558 | −.022 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .296 | .442 | −.146 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .469 | .501 | −.032 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 66th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".