ACL Rangers
A-RAN · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 24 | 20 | +3 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 19.4 | 18.9 | +0.5 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2395 | 1910 | +484 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 32 | 25 | +6 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 62.7% | 62.2% | +0.4% | 40th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 15 | 8 | +6 | 78th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 5 | 0 | +5 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.08 | -0.00 | +0.08 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.73 | 6.22 | +0.51 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.65 | 6.23 | +0.42 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .467 | .500 | −.033 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .506 | .502 | +.004 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.4 | -0.1 | −2.3 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .400 | .492 | −.092 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .480 | .503 | −.023 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .533 | −.533 | 41st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .560 | −.060 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .433 | .439 | −.006 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .444 | .501 | −.057 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".