ACL Rangers
A-RAN · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 24 | 20 | +3 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 19.4 | 18.9 | +0.5 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2395 | 2137 | +257 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 32 | 26 | +5 | 20th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 62.7% | 63.4% | −0.7% | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 15 | 10 | +4 | 74th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 5 | 0 | +5 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.08 | -0.00 | +0.08 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.73 | 6.20 | +0.53 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.65 | 6.20 | +0.45 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .467 | .500 | −.033 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .506 | .503 | +.003 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.4 | -0.2 | −2.2 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .400 | .495 | −.095 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .480 | .500 | −.020 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .557 | −.057 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .433 | .442 | −.009 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .444 | .501 | −.057 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 29th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".