ACL Dodgers
A-DOD · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 31 | 20 | +10 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.7 | 18.9 | +1.8 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2096 | 2137 | −41 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 96.1% | 99.2% | −3.0% | 77th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 39 | 26 | +12 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 51.3% | 63.4% | −12.0% | 76th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 20 | 10 | +9 | 81st of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -45 | 0 | −45 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.76 | -0.00 | −0.76 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.66 | 6.20 | +0.46 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.42 | 6.20 | +1.22 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .424 | .500 | −.076 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .451 | .503 | −.052 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.6 | -0.2 | −1.4 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .333 | .495 | −.162 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .455 | .501 | −.046 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .250 | .525 | −.275 | 39th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .483 | .557 | −.074 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .367 | .443 | −.076 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .478 | .501 | −.023 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 47th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".