ACL Angels
A-ANG · Arizona Complex League Arizona Complex League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 38 | 20 | +17 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.4 | 18.9 | +1.5 | 9th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2192 | 2137 | +54 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 95.6% | 99.2% | −3.5% | 79th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 28 | 26 | +1 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 63.9% | 63.4% | +0.5% | 37th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 10 | +1 | 53rd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -11 | 0 | −11 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.18 | -0.00 | −0.18 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.80 | 6.20 | +0.60 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.98 | 6.20 | +0.78 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .583 | .500 | +.083 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .488 | .503 | −.015 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 5.7 | -0.2 | +5.9 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .667 | .496 | +.171 | 8th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .520 | .500 | +.020 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .750 | .525 | +.225 | 23rd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .600 | .557 | +.043 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .567 | .443 | +.124 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .727 | .501 | +.226 | 3rd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 29th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".