Tuesday, June 21, 2011 · Generic VST · Final
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V-PIR | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 14 | 1 |
| V-TIG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 1 |
Season matchup
V-PIR leads 8 of 8 categories
| V-PIR | Metric | V-TIG |
|---|---|---|
| Offense | ||
| 5.33 26th | Runs scored per game | 5.04 41st |
| Pitching | ||
| 4.90 42nd | Runs allowed per game | 6.21 74th |
| Roster | ||
| 19.0 67th | Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.3 83rd |
| Results | ||
| .556 28th | Winning percentage | .394 68th |
| 31 27th | Run differential | -83 78th |
| .538 30th | Pythagorean winning percentage | .406 71st |
| .600 18th | Winning percentage in one-run games | .476 49th |
| .639 11th | Home winning percentage | .400 68th |
| .472 49th | Road winning percentage | .389 64th |
2011 regular-season totals, each with the club's league rank. The greener side holds the edge; descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) have no better direction and are left uncalled.