Add SportsStats to your home screen

Milwaukee Brewers

MIL · NL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 804 873 −69 12th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 13.6% 15.1% −1.5% 11th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.2 -2.7 +0.5 12th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 4 6 −2 5th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 387 1057 −670 2nd of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 5.8% 17.4% −11.5% 2nd of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.6 4.3 +0.3 9th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 11.9 10.3 +1.6 6th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 17.4 14.3 +3.1 3rd of 30
Total position-player WAR 22.4 17.5 +4.9 6th of 30
Total pitching WAR 23.7 13.7 +10.0 1st of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 53.1% 61.4% −8.3% 20th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.47 0.44 +0.03 11th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 6 4 +2 1st of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 5th of 30
Hitters used 24 23 — 10th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.1 28.3 −0.2 18th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 919 1374 −455 22nd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 15.6% 23.7% −8.2% 21st of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 451 362 +88 11th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 33 31 +1 9th of 30
Rotation WAR 19.3 11.9 +7.4 2nd of 30
Bullpen WAR 10.1 5.0 +5.2 3rd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 10.9 8.2 +2.7 4th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 71.6% 71.1% +0.5% 16th of 30
Quality starts 62 51 +10 7th of 30
Blown saves 25 23 +1 18th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 172 0 +172 1st of 30
Run differential per game 1.17 0.00 +1.17 1st of 30
Runs scored per game 5.05 4.48 +0.57 3rd of 30
Runs allowed per game 3.88 4.48 −0.60 4th of 30
Winning percentage .619 .500 +.119 1st of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .618 .501 +.117 2nd of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 0.2 -0.2 +0.4 15th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .548 .498 +.050 9th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .732 .499 +.233 1st of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .667 .507 +.160 3rd of 30
Home winning percentage .667 .527 +.140 1st of 30
Road winning percentage .569 .472 +.097 4th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .651 .502 +.149 2nd of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 18th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 147 146 — 2nd of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5717 5549 +167 2nd of 30
Team At Bats 4990 4929 +60 4th of 30
Team Runs 742 657 +84 3rd of 30
Team Hits 1280 1201 +78 1st of 30
Team Doubles 255 227 +27 5th of 30
Team Triples 25 19 +5 6th of 30
Team Home Runs 137 168 −31 30th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 701 628 +72 3rd of 30
Team Stolen Bases 143 98 +44 4th of 30
Team Walks 609 493 +115 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1238 1226 +11 17th of 30
Team Walk Rate 10.7% 8.9% +1.8% 1st of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.7% 22.1% −0.4% 12th of 30
Team Batting Average .257 .244 +.013 2nd of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .339 .318 +.021 1st of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .400 .400 — 17th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .739 .718 +.021 4th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 91 73 +17 1st of 30
Team Losses 56 73 −17 1st of 30
Team Saves 46 38 +7 4th of 30
Team Games 147 146 — 2nd of 30
Team Games Started 147 146 — 2nd of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1312.2 1300.2 +11.2 2nd of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1406 1226 +179 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 9.6 8.5 +1.1 2nd of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.3 3.4 −0.1 11th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.56 4.17 −0.61 2nd of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".