Add SportsStats to your home screen

Detroit Tigers

DET · AL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1153 756 +396 25th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 22.4% 14.1% +8.3% 27th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -3.3 -2.6 −0.7 22nd of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 7 5 +1 18th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 900 956 −56 18th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 17.6% 16.9% +0.7% 20th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.1 4.1 +1.0 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 12.2 9.7 +2.5 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 14.8 13.4 +1.4 8th of 30
Total position-player WAR 14.7 16.3 −1.6 19th of 30
Total pitching WAR 13.2 12.6 +0.6 15th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 83.0% 62.3% +20.7% 4th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.42 0.42 −0.01 18th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 3 3 15th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 0 +1 1st of 30
Hitters used 24 22 +1 8th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 27.1 28.4 −1.2 24th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1358 1252 +105 11th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 26.4% 23.3% +3.1% 10th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 337 −337 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 28 30 −2 22nd of 30
Rotation WAR 13.4 11.0 +2.4 9th of 30
Bullpen WAR 2.8 4.3 −1.5 22nd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 8.2 7.7 +0.5 11th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 76.1% 71.1% +5.0% 7th of 30
Quality starts 50 48 +1 13th of 30
Blown saves 32 21 +10 29th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 70 0 +70 7th of 30
Run differential per game 0.52 0.00 +0.52 7th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.41 4.46 −0.05 18th of 30
Runs allowed per game 3.89 4.46 −0.57 6th of 30
Winning percentage .467 .500 −.033 24th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .557 .502 +.056 7th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -12.2 -0.2 −12.0 30th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .361 .499 −.138 29th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .667 .500 +.167 3rd of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .364 .511 −.147 26th of 30
Home winning percentage .500 .528 −.028 19th of 30
Road winning percentage .433 .472 −.039 21st of 30
Winning percentage within the division .342 .503 −.161 27th of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 12th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 135 136 −1 28th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5120 5152 −32 18th of 30
Team At Bats 4543 4575 −32 19th of 30
Team Runs 595 608 −13 18th of 30
Team Hits 1086 1114 −28 21st of 30
Team Doubles 208 210 −2 16th of 30
Team Triples 28 18 +9 2nd of 30
Team Home Runs 155 155 16th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 567 581 −14 18th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 40 92 −52 30th of 30
Team Walks 473 459 +13 11th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1157 1137 +19 19th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.2% 8.9% +0.3% 10th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 22.6% 22.1% +0.5% 20th of 30
Team Batting Average .239 .244 −.005 21st of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .316 .318 −.002 14th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .400 .400 17th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .716 .718 −.002 16th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 63 68 −5 24th of 30
Team Losses 72 68 +3 20th of 30
Team Saves 27 35 −8 26th of 30
Team Games 135 136 −1 28th of 30
Team Games Started 135 136 −1 28th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1194.1 1207.1 −13.0 28th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 20th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1090 1137 −47 21st of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.2 8.5 −0.3 19th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.2 3.4 −0.2 9th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.56 4.16 −0.60 4th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".