Add SportsStats to your home screen

Cincinnati Reds

CIN · NL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1594 874 +719 29th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 28.6% 15.0% +13.6% 29th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -5.4 -2.7 −2.7 29th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 9 6 +2 26th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1364 1063 +300 23rd of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 23.1% 17.3% +5.8% 23rd of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.6 4.3 +1.3 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 9.9 10.3 −0.4 16th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 12.3 14.3 −2.0 23rd of 30
Total position-player WAR 9.8 17.5 −7.7 28th of 30
Total pitching WAR 7.8 13.7 −5.9 25th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 101.0% 61.4% +39.6% 1st of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.38 0.44 −0.06 24th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 2 4 −2 28th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 5th of 30
Hitters used 24 23 — 10th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.0 28.3 −0.3 20th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1768 1387 +380 9th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 31.8% 23.8% +8.0% 9th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 450 364 +85 12th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 30 31 −1 17th of 30
Rotation WAR 8.2 12.0 −3.8 25th of 30
Bullpen WAR 0.4 4.9 −4.5 28th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 7.1 8.2 −1.1 22nd of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 59.1% 71.1% −12.0% 30th of 30
Quality starts 45 52 −7 23rd of 30
Blown saves 21 23 −2 10th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -142 0 −142 28th of 30
Run differential per game -0.97 0.00 −0.97 28th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.16 4.48 −0.32 25th of 30
Runs allowed per game 5.12 4.48 +0.64 28th of 30
Winning percentage .469 .500 −.031 20th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .406 .501 −.095 29th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 9.3 -0.2 +9.5 1st of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .615 .498 +.116 1st of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .327 .499 −.172 29th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .692 .507 +.185 2nd of 30
Home winning percentage .486 .528 −.042 22nd of 30
Road winning percentage .452 .472 −.020 19th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .362 .502 −.140 27th of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 18th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 147 147 — 20th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5512 5588 −76 27th of 30
Team At Bats 4889 4963 −74 28th of 30
Team Runs 611 662 −51 25th of 30
Team Hits 1119 1210 −91 30th of 30
Team Doubles 203 229 −26 27th of 30
Team Triples 12 19 −7 28th of 30
Team Home Runs 196 169 +26 4th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 585 633 −48 26th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 102 99 +2 11th of 30
Team Walks 522 497 +24 9th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1404 1233 +170 30th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.5% 8.9% +0.6% 6th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 25.5% 22.1% +3.4% 30th of 30
Team Batting Average .229 .244 −.015 29th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .307 .318 −.011 30th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .396 .400 −.004 20th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .703 .719 −.016 24th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 69 73 −4 20th of 30
Team Losses 78 73 +4 20th of 30
Team Saves 39 38 — 15th of 30
Team Games 147 147 — 20th of 30
Team Games Started 147 147 — 20th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1301.0 1309.1 −8.1 25th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1192 1233 −41 20th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.2 8.5 −0.3 20th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 4.2 3.4 +0.8 30th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.84 4.18 +0.66 28th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".