Add SportsStats to your home screen

Cincinnati Reds

CIN · NL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1565 838 +726 29th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 28.4% 14.6% +13.8% 29th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -5.3 -2.7 −2.6 28th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 9 6 +2 27th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1121 1056 +64 23rd of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 19.3% 17.5% +1.8% 23rd of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.3 4.3 +1.0 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 9.5 10.2 −0.7 18th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 12.2 14.1 −1.9 24th of 30
Total position-player WAR 10.0 17.3 −7.3 28th of 30
Total pitching WAR 8.2 13.5 −5.3 24th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 95.0% 61.6% +33.4% 1st of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.37 0.44 −0.06 26th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 2 3 −1 27th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 5th of 30
Hitters used 24 23 — 10th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.0 28.3 −0.3 20th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1735 1355 +379 9th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 31.5% 23.6% +7.9% 9th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 447 359 +87 11th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 30 31 −1 17th of 30
Rotation WAR 8.2 11.8 −3.6 25th of 30
Bullpen WAR 0.8 4.7 −3.9 27th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 7.1 8.2 −1.0 22nd of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 59.4% 71.1% −11.6% 30th of 30
Quality starts 45 51 −6 22nd of 30
Blown saves 21 23 −2 10th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -109 0 −109 28th of 30
Run differential per game -0.75 0.00 −0.75 28th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.21 4.48 −0.26 23rd of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.96 4.47 +0.49 26th of 30
Winning percentage .476 .500 −.024 20th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .425 .501 −.076 28th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 7.4 -0.2 +7.6 2nd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .615 .498 +.116 2nd of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .340 .499 −.159 28th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .692 .507 +.185 2nd of 30
Home winning percentage .486 .526 −.040 22nd of 30
Road winning percentage .465 .474 −.009 16th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .370 .502 −.132 27th of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 18th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 145 145 — 14th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5447 5501 −54 22nd of 30
Team At Bats 4827 4885 −58 26th of 30
Team Runs 610 650 −40 23rd of 30
Team Hits 1110 1190 −80 29th of 30
Team Doubles 203 225 −22 27th of 30
Team Triples 12 19 −7 28th of 30
Team Home Runs 195 166 +28 3rd of 30
Team Runs Batted In 582 621 −39 25th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 102 98 +3 11th of 30
Team Walks 519 490 +29 5th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1383 1215 +167 30th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.5% 8.9% +0.6% 6th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 25.4% 22.1% +3.3% 30th of 30
Team Batting Average .230 .244 −.014 29th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .309 .318 −.009 26th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .398 .400 −.002 20th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .707 .718 −.011 22nd of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 69 72 −3 20th of 30
Team Losses 76 72 +3 19th of 30
Team Saves 39 37 +1 15th of 30
Team Games 145 145 — 14th of 30
Team Games Started 145 145 — 14th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1285.0 1289.0 −4.0 20th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1176 1215 −39 20th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.2 8.5 −0.3 20th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 4.2 3.4 +0.8 30th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.66 4.17 +0.49 26th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".