Add SportsStats to your home screen

Chicago White Sox

CWS · AL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 770 862 −92 10th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 13.1% 14.6% −1.5% 11th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.9 -2.8 −0.1 17th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 7 5 +1 17th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 928 1068 −140 16th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 14.4% 17.2% −2.8% 15th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.4 4.4 11th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 12.3 10.4 +1.8 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 17.8 14.5 +3.3 3rd of 30
Total position-player WAR 20.2 17.8 +2.4 7th of 30
Total pitching WAR 13.6 13.9 −0.3 16th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 60.9% 61.5% −0.6% 15th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.45 0.44 +0.01 13th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 6 4 +1 3rd of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 0 +1 2nd of 30
Hitters used 24 23 11th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 26.3 28.3 −2.0 28th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 3013 1411 +1601 1st of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 51.1% 23.9% +27.2% 1st of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 253 369 −116 17th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 33 31 +1 9th of 30
Rotation WAR 13.4 12.1 +1.3 12th of 30
Bullpen WAR 11.1 5.2 +5.9 2nd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 7.4 8.3 −0.9 20th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 84.5% 71.2% +13.3% 1st of 30
Quality starts 36 52 −16 27th of 30
Blown saves 32 24 +7 26th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 34 0 +34 9th of 30
Run differential per game 0.23 0.00 +0.23 9th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.66 4.49 +0.17 7th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.44 4.49 −0.05 15th of 30
Winning percentage .510 .500 +.010 11th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .523 .502 +.021 9th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -1.9 -0.2 −1.7 19th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .556 .499 +.057 9th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .543 .499 +.044 10th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .412 .508 −.096 23rd of 30
Home winning percentage .581 .530 +.052 6th of 30
Road winning percentage .440 .470 −.030 20th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .643 .502 +.141 3rd of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 18th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 149 149 20th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5678 5665 +12 10th of 30
Team At Bats 4992 5031 −39 24th of 30
Team Runs 695 672 +22 7th of 30
Team Hits 1171 1228 −57 26th of 30
Team Doubles 234 232 +1 13th of 30
Team Triples 15 20 −5 22nd of 30
Team Home Runs 193 172 +20 6th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 663 643 +19 7th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 83 100 −17 18th of 30
Team Walks 540 504 +35 5th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1366 1250 +115 26th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.5% 8.9% +0.6% 6th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 24.1% 22.1% +2.0% 26th of 30
Team Batting Average .235 .244 −.009 25th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .318 .319 −.001 11th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .403 .401 +.002 14th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .721 .719 +.002 13th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 76 74 +1 11th of 30
Team Losses 73 74 −1 11th of 30
Team Saves 38 38 17th of 30
Team Games 149 149 20th of 30
Team Games Started 149 149 20th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1326.0 1327.0 −1.0 17th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1233 1250 −17 17th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.4 8.5 −0.1 17th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.6 3.4 +0.2 19th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.13 4.19 −0.06 14th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".