Add SportsStats to your home screen

Baltimore Orioles

BAL · AL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 806 862 −56 12th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 12.9% 14.6% −1.7% 10th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.1 -2.8 +0.7 11th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 6 5 — 13th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 487 1068 −581 4th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 8.3% 17.2% −8.9% 4th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.0 4.4 −0.4 18th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 9.4 10.4 −1.0 20th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 12.9 14.5 −1.6 21st of 30
Total position-player WAR 17.7 17.8 −0.1 13th of 30
Total pitching WAR 14.9 13.9 +1.0 13th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 53.1% 61.5% −8.4% 21st of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.49 0.44 +0.05 7th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 3 4 −1 20th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 6th of 30
Hitters used 27 23 +3 4th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 27.5 28.3 −0.9 23rd of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 2115 1411 +703 7th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 33.9% 23.9% +10.0% 8th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 369 −369 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 30 31 −1 18th of 30
Rotation WAR 10.0 12.1 −2.1 20th of 30
Bullpen WAR 5.4 5.2 +0.2 15th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 8.4 8.3 +0.1 14th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 61.6% 71.2% −9.6% 28th of 30
Quality starts 57 52 +4 12th of 30
Blown saves 21 24 −3 10th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -35 0 −35 20th of 30
Run differential per game -0.23 0.00 −0.23 19th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.48 4.49 −0.01 14th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.71 4.49 +0.22 22nd of 30
Winning percentage .480 .500 −.020 19th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .477 .502 −.025 18th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 0.5 -0.2 +0.7 14th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .421 .499 −.078 27th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .472 .499 −.027 17th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .500 .508 −.008 17th of 30
Home winning percentage .480 .530 −.050 22nd of 30
Road winning percentage .480 .470 +.010 13th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .391 .502 −.111 25th of 30
Longest winning streak 7 6 — 11th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 150 149 — 2nd of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5668 5665 +2 11th of 30
Team At Bats 5000 5031 −31 22nd of 30
Team Runs 672 672 — 14th of 30
Team Hits 1172 1228 −56 25th of 30
Team Doubles 220 232 −12 22nd of 30
Team Triples 19 20 −1 14th of 30
Team Home Runs 179 172 +6 11th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 648 643 +4 13th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 74 100 −26 24th of 30
Team Walks 556 504 +51 4th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1399 1250 +148 28th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.8% 8.9% +0.9% 4th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 24.7% 22.1% +2.6% 28th of 30
Team Batting Average .234 .244 −.010 27th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .316 .319 −.003 15th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .393 .401 −.008 24th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .709 .719 −.010 22nd of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 72 74 −2 19th of 30
Team Losses 78 74 +3 19th of 30
Team Saves 42 38 +3 10th of 30
Team Games 150 149 — 2nd of 30
Team Games Started 150 149 — 2nd of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1335.1 1327.0 +8.0 6th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1207 1250 −43 19th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.1 8.5 −0.4 21st of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.4 3.4 — 13th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.20 4.19 +0.01 18th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".